Last week, the satellite service that keeps Ukraine’s drone interceptors flying was slowed down without warning.
Starshield is the military version of SpaceX’s Starlink. It was throttled to block terminals moving above certain speeds from connecting. Ukrainian interceptor drones, which chase Russian attack drones, stopped working at speed. Russia used the gap to hit energy infrastructure. Reports put the toll at two deaths and at least 17 injuries.
Ukraine’s military says it received no advance notice. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy called the restriction a direct message from Washington. Musk first said SpaceX has no control over Starshield and that the US military makes those calls. The White House denied acting. Later reporting said Musk suggested the slowdown to President Trump, and then that Musk ordered it himself.
The denials miss the larger point. One company, run by one person, controls access to technology a country needs to defend itself.
“For all intents and purposes, SpaceX has a monopoly on launch right now,” said Wendy Whitman Cobb of the School of Advanced Air and Space Studies at Maxwell Air Force Base. She named United Launch Alliance, Blue Origin, and Rocket Lab as competitors. “But nobody comes even close to SpaceX in terms of frequency, mass, scale, cost.”
Space economist OÄŸuz Karasu of the Oxford Space Initiative agreed the monopoly is practical rather than legal. Launch is roughly 8 percent of the space industry by revenue, he said, but “without that 8 percent, you can’t have the rest of it.”
The numbers support that. SpaceX’s Falcon 9 is the most successful rocket ever built. Its rideshare program pushed launch prices to record lows, which let universities and small startups put satellites in orbit. That same success left SpaceX holding the only practical key. Starlink now runs more than 10,000 satellites in low Earth orbit, all launched on SpaceX rockets.
Andrew Reddie, a defense expert at UC Berkeley, frames it as an antitrust problem. SpaceX launches the constellations SpaceX owns, so it has little reason to make launch cheap for rivals building competing networks.
The dependency reaches far beyond Ukraine, and it is already colliding with European and American defense planning. Washington and London are both working through what that reliance means for future security commitments.
SpaceX plans to retire Falcon 9, reportedly taking no new missions from 2028. The Space Force is already struggling to find launches for military satellites. NASA may lose Crew Dragon access for astronaut flights to the space station. After the Columbia disaster in 2003, the US went nine years without launching humans from home soil.
Space infrastructure sits under more of daily life than most people notice. GPS timing signals clear card payments at the gas pump, dispense cash from ATMs, and route ambulances. Handing that layer to a single company concentrates risk in a way no regulator currently measures.
Source: The Verge
The Netherlands, for internationals
One email a week: the week's news for internationals in the Netherlands, new practical guides and what changed in the cities. No spam, unsubscribe any time.
